Anonymous asked: So you want a very attacking president (Mitt Romney) instead? When our approval rate is so high among the world? How about the war crimes committed by George W. Bush? Were those okay? I challenge you to name a president that has done everything perfectly without some form of human rights issues.
I’m going to assume that you’re referring to the post “Why I Refuse to Vote for Barack Obama” and judging from this response it’s clear to me that you didn’t even read the article.
I don’t support Mitt Romney anymore than I support Obama. They’re both different sides of the same coin. Either way we get fucked. I won’t be voting this November because neither candidate in the running aligns with my views.
Your last statement is actually a great argument for my position. Every president who has overseen a war has had the blood of innocence on his hands. This is why war is inherently unjust and voting for the lesser of two evils when both are openly pro-war is ultimately pointless.
You should read the article and let me know what you think. The author addresses arguments just like the one you put forward. And yes, war crimes are bad no matter who perpetrates them.
